Trump administration shut down more than 100 climate studies
Librarians and archivists are doing all that they can to collect and curate already-published web-based government information and data before it is taken offline. However, this administration’s anti-science policies and executive orders will have long-lasting negative impacts in the United States and around the world going forward and for many years to come as scientific grants from across the federal government are cut, rescinded, and no longer funded.
Lost in much of the media coverage these days is the fact that US agencies have long supported the backbone of global sciences, humanitarian, and health data infrastructures. Case in point: USAID data sets are critical to the work of the United Nations and one can find (or *could* find until USAID was shut down) USAID data in places like the UN’s data.un.org open data portal. This goes for data and information from CDC, NIH, NSF, NOAA, EPA, and other scientific agencies.
The Trump administration has shut down more than 100 climate studies. James Temple. Technology Review (June 2, 2025)
The Trump administration has terminated National Science Foundation grants for more than 100 research projects related to climate change amid a widening campaign to slash federal funding for scientists and institutions studying the rising risks of a warming world.
The move will cut off what’s likely to amount to tens of millions of dollars for studies that were previously approved and, in most cases, already in the works.
Affected projects include efforts to develop cleaner fuels, measure methane emissions, improve understanding of how heat waves and sea-level rise disproportionately harm marginalized groups, and help communities transition to sustainable energy, according to an MIT Technology Review review of a GrantWatch database — a volunteer-led effort to track federal cuts to research— and a list of terminated grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF) itself.
Tracking govinfo project logging removed or modified federal publications and websites
There is a long tradition in the govinfo librarian world of assuring access and longevity of published government information. From 1981 until 1998, Anne Heanue and the fine folks at the Washington Office of the American Library Association (ALA) published an amazing series called Less Access to Less Information by and about the U.S. Government, a chronology of efforts to restrict and privatize government information. FGI has long tracked on this issue as well.
And now in the time of the 2nd Trump administration and its well-known attack on federal agencies and the public information and data that they publish, a new and extremely valuable project has started. The Tracking Removed and Modified Government Information & Resources Project (aka Tracking Gov Info Project) is looking to compile a comprehensive list of government websites, documents, articles, reports, etc. that have been removed or modified by the current administration. Anyone who encounters a missing resource can enter it using their submission form. Entries can be viewed publicly on the spreadsheet. There are already 82 instances posted!
The project is currently led by government information and social science librarians from the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, and the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (my alma mater!).
I’m really glad to see efforts like TGP coming online in this really tenuous time for the public domain.
New from FreeGovInfo Press: “Preserving Government Information: Past, Present, and Future”
Jim Jacobs and I are pleased to announce the publication of our book Preserving Government Information: Past, Present, and Future. It is available as a free PDF, a free ePub, and a print-book ($20) at https://freegovinfo.info/pgi.
In this book, we examine how preservation practices of the past affect the preservation of digitally published federal government information today, we analyze data to characterize the current scale of government publishing and the gaps in preservation, and we look to the future by charting a path to a distributed Digital Preservation Infrastructure for government information.
We address technical issues without unnecessarily technical jargon. The book is designed to be used by LIS students, front-line librarians and archivists, managers of libraries and archives, government workers who publish and preserve government information, and policy makers who design laws and regulations that affect the production, dissemination and preservation of government information.
Early praise for Preserving Government Information:
If you want to understand the breadth of published government information, this book explains it. If you would like a deeper understanding about why it is important to preserve government information, this book convinces you. If you’re considering helping to preserve government information, this book will motivate you and show you the ways. If you’re working to preserve government information, this book will help you become more effective. Written by two of the nation’s leading and well-respected government documents experts, this thorough work is uncannily timely. Preserve Government information, preserve the record of government actions.
–David Rosenthal and Victoria Reich, co-founders, LOCKSS
Our times practically scream for this crucial book from Jacobs and Jacobs. Long respected for their expertise with data, government information, and libraries, the authors apply their considerable skills toward the conundrum of preserving digital government information before we watch it disappear. In artfully critiquing many projects, studies, ad hoc groups, and agencies that have gone before, the authors provide a non-technical introduction to what is needed right away: an open digital preservation infrastructure.
Jacobs and Jacobs offer a well-researched distillation of our collective wisdom and our digital and tangible pasts, a mind-opening theoretical review, and thank goodness, a path forward. Their careful, well researched, always critical insights will find an eager readership. Concluding with a principled call to arms, Preserving Government Information stands to become a core reading in many professional settings and in library/information studies.
–Cass Hartnett, U.S. Documents Librarian, University of Washington
Hot off the presses: “Bernadine’s Office Building: Working in the capitol and other dangerous places”
Have you ever wondered what it’s like to work on Capitol Hill as a Congressional staffer? Well, wonder no more. Bernadine Abbott Hoduski, library star, mother of government documents in libraries, and tireless advocate for libraries, has just published her memoir “Bernadine’s Office Building: Working in the capitol and other dangerous places.” It’s sure to be a page turner, so pick one up for yourself and one for your library while you’re at it!
Bernadine Abbott Hoduski was a long-time government documents librarian in both academic and governmental libraries, including twenty years as a professional staff member of the Congressional Joint Committee on Printing (JCP) in Washington, D.C., where she also taught government documents at Catholic University. She was the co-editor of Documents to the People, federal documents editor for the Government Publications Review, and wrote a column for The Unabashed Librarian. She is the author of Lobbying for Libraries and the Public’s Access to Government Information: An Insider’s View (Scarecrow Press, 2003), and chaired both the ALA Committee on Legislation and the GODORT Legislation Committee. She is now retired and lives in Missouri.
FGI public testimony before Congress advocates for GPO gift authority
Here’s something fun I did this week. For their public witness day, I submitted testimony before the House appropriations subcommittee on the legislative branch for their FY2026 budget. :slightly_smiling_face: Many thanks to Daniel Schuman of the American Governance Institute and founder and an editor of the First Branch Forecast (you’re all subscribed to FBF right?!). Daniel was so well organized, got a whole host of folks to submit testimony to the subcommittee, and helpfully walked me through the entire process! Let’s hope at least some of the recommendations make it through the appropriations process. I was a little surprised that I didn’t see any representatives from any of the major library associations there, especially given that this subcommittee deals with funding for the Government Publishing Office (GPO) and Library of Congress among other aspects of the legislative branch — though this is of course NOT a regular year (understatement of the decade!) in the normally regular appropriations process.
Testimony Before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch, FY 2026, Concerning Gift Authority for the Government Publishing Office, submitted by James R. Jacobs, US Government Information Librarian, Stanford University.
Testimony Before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch, FY 2026, Concerning Gift Authority for the Government Publishing Office, submitted by James R. Jacobs, US Government Information Librarian, Stanford University
Dear Chair Valadao, Ranking Member Espaillat, and distinguished members of the Subcommittee:
Thank you for the opportunity to address you and this committee today regarding a matter concerning the efficiency, modernization, and public service mission of the Government Publishing Office (GPO). My testimony advocates for a statutory change granting GPO the explicit authority to accept gifts, bequests, and devices of both monetary and nonmonetary property and distribute grants to libraries in the Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP).
I am the US government information librarian at Stanford University and my library’s Federal Depository Library Program coordinator. Stanford has been an FDLP member since 1895. As such, my everyday work is to build historic collections and offer research services to students, faculty, staff and the general public in Santa Clara County and increasingly across the country.
The authority of government agencies to accept gifts and distribute grants is generally restricted without specific statutory authorization. As the Government Accountability Office has noted, “without statutory authority, an individual government agency may not accept gifts of goods or services for its own use”. However, other legislative branch entities, such as the Library of Congress, and other federal entities with missions concerning access to information, like the Smithsonian Institution and the National Archives and Records Administration, possess such authority. We recommend gift authority be extended to the GPO.
Providing gift authority to the GPO would yield several significant benefits:
1. Saving Taxpayer Money: Acceptance of gifts, bequests, and devises can provide GPO with resources beyond its appropriated budget. This could allow GPO to undertake valuable projects in collaboration with FDLP libraries and other organizations, invest in modernization efforts, and enhance its services without requiring additional taxpayer funds. For example, donations could support the digitization and description of historical documents in the “National Collection,” the development of new tools for public access, and the preservation of tangible collections.
2. Economy of Services: Nonmonetary gifts, such as in-kind services, equipment, or collections of historical materials, could significantly enhance GPO’s operational capacity and resources. Accepting voluntary and uncompensated personal services, for example, could allow for the accession of digitized documents from FDLP libraries or assistance with adding metadata. Granting authority would be a virtuous loop to help to fund preservation and digitization projects in FDLP libraries which would then feed back into GPO’s systems for the betterment of all American citizens. This could speed up the process by which materials are made publicly available and decrease the cost for doing so.
3. Improving Public Access to Information: Enhanced resources through gift acceptance can directly translate to improved public access to government information. Donations and grants could fund initiatives to improve the online repository govinfo.gov, enhance cataloging and indexing services, or support Federal Depository Libraries in their mission to provide no-fee access to government information.
This is an issue that has been previously contemplated by Congress. Draft legislation released by Congress for public comment contained a provision regarding gift authority in section 563. It stated clearly:
The Public Printer may accept and use gifts and bequests of property (both real and personal) and services in support of the Superintendent’s responsibilities under this chapter.
Section 109 of that bill provided for congressional oversight of the gifts and disclosure of gifts in semi-annual reports. This seems an appropriate framework.
There are few circumstances where Congress can have its cake and eat it too. Extending to GPO the authority to receive gifts and distribute grants could provide enormous benefits to the American people in terms of access to records and do so at no cost to taxpayers. We respectfully request that you provide to GPO the same gift authority that is already available to other agencies who provide the public with access to government records. My recommendation would positively impact the work of the GPO, the 1100+ FDLP libraries and every citizen in every Congressional district.
I welcome the opportunity to discuss this with you further.
Thank you for your interest and attention.
Latest Comments