Skip to content

Why does Alacritty terminal gets more attention than Kitty? #2701

Closed

Description

Image for: Description

Kitty is super fast. Very stable. Well maintained. Provide the minimal features (split screen, tabs) for a fully working terminal (no need to add another indirection layer, like tmux, that will add complexity to your workflow, or hope that your OS have a window manager that will fill the features gap left by Alacritty).

I understand the point of Alacritty, their reasons, and it is a great terminal but it seems that Kitty has all of Alacritty's strenghts plus do not lack the minimal set of features to make it a fully working terminal out-of-the-box.

Metadata

Image for: Metadata

Metadata

Image for: Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    Image for: Issue actions